What Does New York Law Say about Restaurant Owners’ Duty to Provide a Safe Environment to Their Patrons?
Under New York law, property owners - including restaurant owners - have a duty to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition. This duty of care is part of the broader principles of negligence in New York law. Several court decisions in New York have defined and clarified the responsibilities of property owners. For example:
Basso v. Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233 (1976): This case established that property owners have a duty to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition, considering the foreseeability of injury.
Kush v. City of Buffalo, 59 N.Y.2d 26 (1983): This case reinforced the idea that a property owner’s duty is to take reasonable steps to prevent harm from foreseeable hazards.
Can a Restaurant or Bar Owner Be Held Liable If I Am Assaulted on Their Premises?
If the owner fails to take these steps, and if you are assaulted by a thief, robber, or any other criminal element on their premises, you can hold them liable for your injuries.
How Our New York Restaurant Injury Lawyers Will Counter the ‘Open and Obvious’ Defense by the Restaurant Owner to Establish Liability
Property owners in New York often try to use the ‘open and obvious’ defense to avoid liability for accidents that occur on their premises. This defense argues that the hazardous condition that caused the accident was so apparent that any reasonable person would have noticed it and avoided it.
At the Law Offices of Michael S. Lamonsoff, we will find the evidence to challenge the open and obvious defense and hold the restaurant owner accountable. The steps we can take include:
Detailed Evidence Collection
We can gather comprehensive evidence - including photos, videos, and witness statements - to demonstrate that the hazard was not as apparent as the owner claims. For instance, poor lighting, obstructed views, or other distractions might have made the hazard less noticeable.
Examining Reasonable Expectations
We can argue that even if the hazard was visible, it might not have been something a reasonable person would expect to encounter in a restaurant setting. For example, if a step was unusually high or uneven, it could still be considered a hidden danger despite being visible.
Assessing the Owner's Duty
We can emphasize that the restaurant owner has a duty to maintain a safe environment and take reasonable steps to protect customers. This includes fixing known hazards or adequately warning patrons of potential dangers. We can investigate and determine whether the owner failed to uphold this duty and prove their negligence with evidence.
Proving Distractions
We can examine whether there were any distractions that prevented you from noticing the hazard. For example, dim lighting can contribute to a situation where a reasonable person might not notice a danger, even if it is visible.
By carefully building your case and addressing each and every element of the restaurant owner’s defense, we can demonstrate that their negligence played a significant role in your injury and make sure you are adequately compensated for your losses.